Skip to content
e‑ISSN 2148-905X Open Access · CC BY 4.0
Vol. 13 · Issue 1 · 2026 Mar 15, 2026 Research Article

Investigation of University Student-Athletes’ Perceptions of Wearable Technological Sports Product Usage in Terms of Demographic Variables

FK
Filiz Kücükalpelli Corresponding Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Burdur, Türkiye filizalpelli.1978@gmail.com Turkey
Pages83-98 PublishedMar 15, 2026 LicenseOpen Access
PDF (Türkçe)
VOL 13 · ISS 1 · 2026 Sportive Perspective: Journal of Sports and Educational Sciences View issue

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the usage perceptions of wearable technological sports products among university students who actively participate in sports, in terms of various demographic variables. The sample of the study consists of 250 university student-athletes enrolled in the Faculty of Sport Sciences at Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University and who regularly participate in sporting activities. The participants are involved in different sports branches and use wearable technological products in individual or team-based training processes. The data were collected through a “Personal Information Form” developed by the researcher and the “Wearable Technological Sports Products Usage Perception Scale (WTSPUPS).” In determining the differences in scale sub-dimensions according to the demographic variables of the participants, it was found that the total scale score and all sub-dimensions did not demonstrate normal distribution. Therefore, non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis) were preferred in the sub-dimension analyses. As a result, it was determined that the perception levels of university student-athletes toward wearable technological sports products are generally at a moderate level. This perception level is significantly influenced by behavioral variables such as frequency of product use and weekly frequency of engaging in sports. Student-athletes who use the products more frequently and participate in sports more days per week were found to have higher scores in the sub-dimensions of perceived benefit, functionality, and intention to continue use. Additionally, gender was found to be a determining variable in the intention to continue use sub-dimension, while income level was found to be influential in the fashion-aesthetics and functionality sub-dimensions. Age was found to have a positive effect particularly on the facilitating conditions sub-dimension.

Keywords

#University student-athletes #usage perception #wearable technological sports products

References

  1. Ada, A., & Aksoy, R. (2020). Giyilebilir teknolojik ürünlerde tüketicilerin algıladıkları risklerin farklılaşması: Akıllı saat kullanıcılarına dönük bir araştırma. Journal of Sport for All and Recreation, 2(1), 50-61. https://izlik.org/JA78NE48MC
  2. Bardus, M., Borgi, C., El-Harakeh, M., Gherbal, T., Kharroubi, S., & Fares, E.-J. (2021). Exploring the use of mobile and wearable technology among university student athletes in lebanon: A cross-sectional study. Sensors, 21(13), 4472, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21134472
  3. Bendíková, E., & Dobay, B. (2017). Physical and sport education as a tool for development of a positive attitude toward health and physical activity in adulthood. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(1), 14-21.
  4. Borowski-Beszta, M., & Polasik, M. (2020). Wearable devices: New quality in sports and finance. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20, 1077-1084.
  5. Buyrukoğlu, E., & Bayındır, M. (2023). Giyilebilir teknolojik spor ürünleri kullanımı üzerine bir araştırma. Tekstil ve Mühendis, 30(131), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.7216/teksmuh.1282117
  6. Cadmus-Bertram, L., Marcus, B., Patterson, R., Parker, B., & Morey, B. (2015). Randomized trial of a fitbit-based physical activity intervention for women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(3), 414-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.020
  7. Chandrasekaran, R., Katthula, V., & Moustakas, E. (2020). Patterns of use and key predictors for the use of wearable health care devices by US adults: Insights from a national survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), e22443, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.2196/22443
  8. Colley, R. C., Garriguet, D., Janssen, I., Craig, C. L., Clarke, J., & Tremblay, M. S. (2007). Physical activity of Canadian adults: Accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian health measures survey. Health Reports, 22(1), 1-8.
  9. Çar, B., Bezci, Ş., Dokuzoğlu, G., & Kurtoğlu, A. (2022). Giyilebilir teknolojik spor ürünlerine yönelik tutum ölçeği (GTSÜYTÖ) geliştirme çalışması. Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 1155-1167. https://doi.org/10.38021/asbid.1202130
  10. Davis, S. (2024). Wearable technology use amongst college freshmen. University of Michigan.
  11. Falck, R. S., McDonald, S. M., Beets, M. W., Brazendale, K., & Liu-Ambrose, T. (2015). Measurement of physical activity in older adult interventions: A systematic review. British Journal of Sport Medicine, 50(8), 1381-1389.
  12. Gkika, E. C., Komisopoulos, F., Ntanos, S., Drosos, D., & Kargas, A. (2024). Amateur athletes and adoption of smartwatches: Perceptions of usage, ease of use, and the role of virtual community immersion. In. Kavoura, A., Borges-Tiago, T., & Tiago, F., (Eds.), Strategic İnnovative Marketing and Tourism: ICSIMAT 2023 (pp. 531-539). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51038-0_58
  13. Kadylak, T., & S. R. Cotten. (2018). Factors that influence wearable activity tracker adoption and use among U.S. older adults. Innovation in Aging, 2(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igy023.152
  14. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (21. Baskı). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  15. Karasar, N. (2015). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (24. Baskı). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  16. Lee, S. M., & Lee, D. (2020). Healthcare wearable devices: An analysis of key factors for continuous use intention. Service Business, 14(4), 503-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-020-00428-3
  17. Macridis, S., Johnston, N., Johnson, S., & Vallance, J. K. (2018). Consumer physical activity tracking device ownership and use among a population-based sample of adults. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0189298, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189298
  18. Melton, B., Buman, M., Vogel, R., Harris, B., & Bigham, L. (2016). Wearable devices to improve physical activity and sleep: A randomized controlled trial of college-aged African American women. Journal of Black Studies, 47(6), 610-625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934716653349
  19. Metin, S. N., Başkaya, G., Öcal, T., Erdoğan, A., & Tosun Tunç, G. (2023). Spor bilimleri fakültesi öğrencilerinin giyilebilir teknolojik ürün kullanımlarının fiziksel aktiviteye katılım motivasyonları üzerine etkisi. Yalova Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(3), 1-18. https://izlik.org/JA78ND22GZ
  20. Peng, C., Xi, N., Hong, Z., & Hamari, J. (2022). Acceptance of wearable technology: A meta-analysis. Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5101-5010. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/79958
  21. Pope, Z. C., Barr-Anderson, D. J., Lewis, B. A., Pereira, M. A., & Gao, Z. (2019). Use of wearable technology and social media to improve physical activity and dietary behaviors among college students: A 12-week randomized pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193579
  22. Song, J., Kim, J., & Cho, K. (2018). Understanding users’ continuance intentions to use smart-connected sports products. Sport Management Review, 21(5), 477-490.
  23. Tiryaki, İ., & Gödekmerdan Öner, L. (2022). Tüketicilerin akıllı giyilebilir nesnelerin kullanımına yönelik davranış niyetlerinin geliştirilmiş teknoloji kabul modeli aracılığıyla incelenmesi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(1), 182-202. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2022.1374
  24. Tor Kadıoğlu, C., & Turhan, G. (2022). Spor giyiminde akıllı ürünlere yönelik satın alma tutumlarında ürün tasarımı ve tüketici özelliklerine bakış. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 633-652. https://izlik.org/JA23GP97EG
  25. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
  26. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  27. Wang, Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, L. (2022). Assessing the intention to use sports bracelets among Chinese university students: An extension of technology acceptance model with sports motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 846594, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846594
  28. Wang, Z., Fang, D., Liu, X., Zhang, L., Duan, H., Wang, C., & Guo, K. (2023). Consumer acceptance of sports wearables: The role of product attributes. SAGE Open, 13(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231182653
  29. Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Li, X. (2024). From wearables to performance: How acceptance of ıot devices influences physical education results of college freshmen. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75071-3
  30. Yang, C. C., Shen, C. C., Lin, Y. S., & Lin, C. T. (2021). The research on the relationship between use motivation, target orientation and sports involvement in sports intelligent wearable equipment. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 16(2), 434-443. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.16.Proc2.29
  31. Yüce, A., Aydoğdu, V., Katırcı, H., & Gökce Yüce, S. (2020). Giyilebilir teknolojik spor ürünleri kullanım algısı ölçeği: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(4), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.681835
  32. Zeng, N., & Gao, Z. (2017). Health wearable devices and physical activity promotion. In Z. Gao (Ed.), Technology in physical activity and health promotion (pp. 148-164). Routledge Publishers.

License

CCBY 4.0
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

This work is openly licensed — share and adapt freely with attribution to the authors and the journal. View license terms ↗

Copyright (c) 2026 Sportif Bakış: Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi

§ 06 — Related

Similar articles in this journal

Related peer-reviewed studies published in this journal.
View all issues