Skip to content
e‑ISSN 2148-905X Open Access · CC BY 4.0
Vol. 13 · Issue 3 · 2026 Sep 15, 2026 Research Article

Effects of Mental Training and Cognitive-Motor-Based Life Kinetik Training on Attention and Concentration Performance in Volleyball Players: A Behavioral and Neurofeedback-Task Assessment

TY
Turgut Yildirim Corresponding Hitit University, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Çorum, Türkiye turgutyildirim@hitit.edu.tr Turkey
CT
Celal Taskiran Hitit University, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Çorum, Türkiye Turkey
RE
Rıdvan Ekmekci Pamukkale University, Faculty of Sport Science , Denizli, Türkiye, Turkey
ED
Erkan Demirkan Hitit University, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Çorum, Türkiye Turkey
Pages324-338 PublishedSep 15, 2026 LicenseOpen Access
PDF
VOL 13 · ISS 3 · 2026 Sportive Perspective: Journal of Sports and Educational Sciences View issue

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of mental training and cognitive-motor-based life kinetik interventions on attention and concentration performance in volleyball players, using the d2 Attention Test as the primary behavioral outcome and an attention-contingent neurofeedback task (NeuroSky MindWave Mobile 2, Brainwave Visualizer barrel-bursting task) as a supplementary, exploratory index. A quasi-experimental, non-randomized pretest-posttest design was employed, using purposive sampling. A total of 66 volleyball players aged 14-16 years were assigned to a mental training group (n=22), a life kinetik group (n=22), and a control group (n=22) that continued routine volleyball training only. Measurements were taken at pretest, posttest (Week 8), Week 12, and Week 16, and analyzed with a 3×4 mixed-design ANOVA. Both intervention groups showed significant, sustained improvements in attention and concentration relative to Control (all Group×Time interactions p<.001). The two intervention groups did not differ significantly from one another on either d2 outcome at any post-intervention time point; the only significant direct contrast between them (neurofeedback-task Barrel Count) favored mental training. Gains were largely maintained through the 16-week follow-up, with a partial decline evident between posttest and follow-up. These findings indicate that both mental training and life kinetik training improve attention and concentration performance in volleyball players relative to standard training alone, without evidence that either intervention is superior to the other.

Keywords

#Attention #cognitive-motor training #neurofeedback #life kinetik #volleyball

References

  1. Beşler, H. K. (2020). Zihinsel antrenmanın futbol antrenörlerinin dikkat ve konsantrasyon düzeylerine etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
  2. Brickenkamp, R., & Zillmer, E. (1998). The d2 test of attention. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
  3. Brimmell, J., Edwards, E. J., & Vaughan, R. S. (2024). Executive function and visual attention in sport: A systematic review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(2), 1278-1311. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2022.2145574
  4. Broadbent, D. P., Causer, J., Williams, A. M., & Ford, P. R. (2015). Perceptual-Cognitive skill training and its transfer to expert performance in the field: Future research directions. European Journal of Sport Science, 15(4), 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2014.957727
  5. Cheng, M.-Y., Yu, C.-L., An, X., Wang, L., Tsai, C.-L., Qi, F., & Wang, K.-P. (2024). Evaluating EEG neurofeedback in sport psychology: A systematic review of RCT studies for insights into mechanisms and performance improvement. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1331997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331997
  6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
  8. Çağlar, E., & Koruç, Z. (2006). D2 dikkat testinin sporcularda güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(2), 58-80.
  9. Delgado, P., Passos, P., Tavares, F., & Ferreira, H. A. (2025). Electroencephalographic and cognitive task analysis of working memory and attention in athletes: A systematic review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 80, 102930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102930
  10. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  11. Gu, Q., Zou, L., Loprinzi, P. D., Quan, M., & Huang, T. (2019). Effects of open versus closed skill exercise on cognitive function: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1707. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01707
  12. Heilmann, F., Weinberg, H., & Wollny, R. (2022). The impact of practicing open-vs. closed-skill sports on executive functions: A meta-analytic and systematic review with a focus on characteristics of sports. Brain Sciences, 12(8), 1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081071
  13. Herold, F., Hamacher, D., Schega, L., & Müller, N. G. (2018). Thinking while moving or moving while thinking: Concepts of motor-cognitive training for cognitive performance enhancement. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 10, 228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00228
  14. Koch, P., & Krenn, B. (2021). Executive functions in elite athletes-comparing open-skill and closed-skill sports and considering the role of athletes’ past involvement in both sport categories. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 55, 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101925
  15. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
  16. Li, L., & Smith, D. M. (2021). Neural efficiency in athletes: A systematic review. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 698555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.698555
  17. Lopes da Silva, F. (2013). EEG and MEG: Relevance to neuroscience. Neuron, 80(5), 1112-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.017
  18. Lotze, M., & Halsband, U. (2006). Motor imagery. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 99(4-6), 386-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.012
  19. Lucia, S., Bianco, V., & Di Russo, F. (2023). Specific effect of a cognitive-motor dual-task training on sport performance and brain processing associated with decision-making in semi-elite basketball players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 64, 102302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102302
  20. Mao, F., Yin, A., Zhao, S., & Fang, Q. (2024). Effects of football training on cognitive performance in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1449612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1449612
  21. Memmert, D., Simons, D. J., & Grimme, T. (2009). The relationship between visual attention and expertise in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.002
  22. Moreira, P. E. D., Dieguez, G. T. O., Bredt, S. D. G. T., & Praça, G. M. (2021). The acute and chronic effects of dual-task on the motor and cognitive performances in athletes: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1732. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041732
  23. Morrone, J. M., & Pedlar, C. R. (2024). EEG-based neurophysiological indices for expert psychomotor performance a review. Brain and Cognition, 175, 106132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106132
  24. Munzert, J., Lorey, B., & Zentgraf, K. (2009). Cognitive motor processes: The role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Research Reviews, 60(2), 306-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.024
  25. NeuroSky Inc. (2022). MindWave Mobile 2. Retrieved from https://neurosky.com/neurosky-products/mindwave-headset/
  26. NeuroSky Inc. (2018). Knowledge base: Brainwave Visualizer-mini-games and intended use. NeuroSky Support. https://www.support.neurosky.com
  27. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., ... & Duchesnay, É. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. the Journal of machine Learning research, 12, 2825-2830.
  28. Ray, W. J., & Cole, H. W. (1985). EEG alpha activity reflects attentional demands, and beta activity reflects emotional and cognitive processes. Science, 228(4700), 750-752. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3992243
  29. Romeas, T., Guldner, A., & Faubert, J. (2016). 3D-multiple object tracking training task improves passing decision-making accuracy in soccer players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.06.002
  30. Vealey, R. S. (2024). A framework for mental training in sport: Enhancing mental skills, wellbeing, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 36(2), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2023.2274459
  31. Voss, M. W., Kramer, A. F., Basak, C., Prakash, R. S., & Roberts, B. (2010). Are expert athletes ‘expert’ in the cognitive laboratory? A meta-analytic review of cognition and sport expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 812-826. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1588
  32. Williams, A. M., & Ericsson, K. A. (2005). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: Some considerations when applying the expert performance approach. Human Movement Science, 24(3), 283-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.002
  33. Wu, J., Qiu, P., Lv, S., Chen, M., & Li, Y. (2024). The effects of cognitive-motor dual-task training on athletes’ cognition and motor performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1284787. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1284787
  34. Zwierko, M., Jedziniak, W., Popowczak, M., & Rokita, A. (2023). Reactive agility in competitive young volleyball players: A gender comparison of perceptual-cognitive and motor determinants. Journal of Human Kinetics, 85, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0112

License

CCBY 4.0
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

This work is openly licensed — share and adapt freely with attribution to the authors and the journal. View license terms ↗

Copyright (c) 2026 Sportif Bakış: Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi

§ 06 — Related

Similar articles in this journal

Related peer-reviewed studies published in this journal.
View all issues